Experience Evidence
Approved before/after screens, responsive improvements, navigation changes or documented workflow improvements.
This page defines the structure SMA can use for real case studies. It deliberately avoids invented client results and makes room for verified evidence when a project is approved for publication.
Each published case study can follow the framework below so readers understand the requirement, the reasoning and what can actually be verified.
Introduce the business category, target audience, existing digital setup and the reason the project was started. Only disclose client details that are approved for publication.
Describe the practical problem: unclear positioning, outdated experience, weak enquiry path, fragmented campaign journey, technical limitation or another documented requirement.
Explain the priorities, user journey, content hierarchy, channel plan or technical direction and why those choices matched the brief.
Use verified analytics, documented before/after changes, approved screenshots or operational improvements. State the measurement period and avoid presenting assumptions as outcomes.
Document remaining opportunities, planned iterations or the next workstream without implying guaranteed future performance.
Approved before/after screens, responsive improvements, navigation changes or documented workflow improvements.
Verified analytics or platform data with a defined period, context and relevant limitations.
Documented functionality, integrations, pages, campaign assets or systems that were actually delivered.
Good case studies are easier when objectives, scope, baseline information and measurement requirements are documented before launch.
Briefs, approved designs, launch notes and measurement exports make later case-study writing more reliable.
Clearly distinguish measured outcomes from strategic reasoning or qualitative observations.
Define the requirement, scope and measurement foundation from day one.